Tennessee Supreme Court Rejects Ethics Opinion on Prosecutors’ Brady Obligation


Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/daneciolino/public_html/lalegalethics/wp-content/plugins/footnotation/footnotation.php on line 193

On August 23, 2019, the Tennessee Supreme Court declared that “the ethical obligations” of prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence under Rule 3.8(d) of Tennessee’s Rules of Professional Conduct are “coextensive …

LSBA Rejects Rule Amendment to Clarify Prosecutors’ Brady Disclosure Obligations


Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/daneciolino/public_html/lalegalethics/wp-content/plugins/footnotation/footnotation.php on line 193

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/daneciolino/public_html/lalegalethics/wp-content/plugins/footnotation/footnotation.php on line 193

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/daneciolino/public_html/lalegalethics/wp-content/plugins/footnotation/footnotation.php on line 193

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/daneciolino/public_html/lalegalethics/wp-content/plugins/footnotation/footnotation.php on line 193

Nearly two years ago, the Louisiana Supreme Court resolved an unsettled question as to whether a prosecutor’s “ethical” duty to disclose exculpatory evidence under Louisiana Rule of Professional Conduct 3.8(d) …

Is a Prosecutor’s “Ethical” Obligation to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence Broader Than the “Constitutional” Obligation to Do So?


Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/daneciolino/public_html/lalegalethics/wp-content/plugins/footnotation/footnotation.php on line 193

The Due Process Clause requires a prosecutor to disclosure exculpatory evidence only if the evidence is “material.” Evidence is “material” when failing to produce it would be “of sufficient significance …