Idaho Becomes Seventh State to Reject ABA’s Model Anti-Discrimination Rule


Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/daneciolino/public_html/lalegalethics/wp-content/plugins/footnotation/footnotation.php on line 193

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/daneciolino/public_html/lalegalethics/wp-content/plugins/footnotation/footnotation.php on line 193

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/daneciolino/public_html/lalegalethics/wp-content/plugins/footnotation/footnotation.php on line 193

On September 10, 2018, the Idaho Supreme Court Supreme Court rejected efforts to amend the Idaho Rules of Professional Conduct to add the anti-discrimination provision now included in ABA Model …

LSBA Makes “No Recommendation” on Adoption of Anti-Discrimination and Anti-Harassment Rule


Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/daneciolino/public_html/lalegalethics/wp-content/plugins/footnotation/footnotation.php on line 193

Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/daneciolino/public_html/lalegalethics/wp-content/plugins/footnotation/footnotation.php on line 193

On November 27, 2017, the LSBA Rules of Professional Conduct Committee reported that it would make “no recommendation” regarding the adoption of a rule prohibiting discrimination and harassment in conduct …

ABA Adopts Broad Anti-Harassment Rule. Will Louisiana Follow?


Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type bool in /home/daneciolino/public_html/lalegalethics/wp-content/plugins/footnotation/footnotation.php on line 193

On August 8, 2016, the ABA House of Delegates amended Model Rule 8.4 to include a broad anti-discrimination and anti-harassment provision, and three revised comments. The amendment, which was sponsored by …