Skip to content
Louisiana Legal Ethics

Louisiana Legal Ethics

A legal ethics blog of Prof. Dane S. Ciolino

Menu
  • Home
  • 2020 Book
  • Newsletter
  • Rules
    • LASC Rule XIX
  • Resources
    • MPRE Review
    • FAQs
    • Model Lawyer-Client Agreements
    • Professionalism
    • Disclaimer
  • Prof. Dane S. Ciolino

Article 2. Counselor

  1. Rule 2.1. Advisor
  2. Rule 2.2. Intermediary [Deleted]
  3. Rule 2.3. Evaluation for Use by Third Persons
  4. Rule 2.4. Lawyer Serving as Third-Party Neutral

Our 2020 Book

Our Free Newsletter

Follow, Like, and Share

RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
fb-share-icon
Twitter
Follow Me
Tweet
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Share

Tweets Tweets Tweets

  • La. Legal EthicsSloppy Arbitration Clauses are Unenforceable https://t.co/nzcElDrpdo, Dec 21
  • La. Legal EthicsABA Issues Opinion on Conflicts Arising Out of Personal Relationship with Opposing Counsel https://t.co/ErTvtA8t5s, Oct 16
  • La. Legal EthicsAre Unusual Contingency Fee Agreements Lawyer-Client Business Transactions? https://t.co/rN1tZ5fMeK, Oct 14
  • La. Legal EthicsSeptember 2020 Discipline These lawyers were the subject of Louisiana Supreme Court disciplinary orders or Louisiana Attorney Disciplinary Board recommendations published during the month of September 2020. https://t.co/6Eb0eDegTm, Oct 14
  • La. Legal EthicsRT @TAPressly: Did you know that the Louisiana Bar Association is lobbying against tort reform? I’m a dues paying member to the bar and ADAMANTLY OPPOSE the organization lobbying for or against any bill. To oppose a bill that will make Louisiana competitive is unconscionable. https://t.co/2KSRrEFGsH, May 13
Follow us on Twitter
Follow @lalegalethics

Search Site

Our Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Our Free Newsletter
Our Social Media
Copyright © 2021 Louisiana Legal Ethics – OnePress theme by FameThemes